Choosing the gear ratio is the most important step when buying a worm gear reducer.
Calculate it as input speed divided by required output speed. For example, reducing 1,750 rpm to 35 rpm requires approximately a 50:1 ratio. A higher ratio is not automatically better. It may increase torque, but it can also reduce efficiency and create more heat.
Use the actual load, not only the motor nameplate. At 1,750 rpm and 1.5 kW, input torque is about 8.2 N·m. With a 50:1 ratio and 70% efficiency, theoretical output torque approaches 287 N·m. Real results vary with lubrication, temperature, duty cycle, and installation accuracy.
The U.S. Department of Energy reports that motor-driven systems can consume about 70% of industrial electricity, so inefficient reduction deserves attention. Small losses become expensive over continuous operation.
Check the reducer’s rated torque against starting torque and shock loads. Conveyor systems, mixers, and lifting equipment may need different reduction levels, even with similar motor power. The IEA estimates motor-driven systems account for roughly 46% of global electricity consumption, reinforcing the value of correct sizing.
Self-locking is sometimes expected from high-ratio worm drives. That assumption needs review. Self-locking depends on lead angle, friction, wear, and operating conditions; it should not replace a dedicated safety brake.
A practical selection should compare speed, torque, efficiency, thermal capacity, and service factor together.